Things have been hectic, and thus I am a bit late on this, but I wanted to follow up on
my post from May 1, 2008 about the Hyres Photography Festival and the work of
Diana Scherer.
First let me reiterate how impressed I was with the work competing at
Hyeres, not just the winners. I am smitten with the photo-diaries of
Patrick Tsai & Madi Ju, which I feel are relevant and should be recorded, because it reflects the contemporary world so well and also how it is changing.
Another artists I was introduced to via
Hyeres was
Diana Scherer . I was instinctively interested in her
"Still-Life" work, but was left uneasy because of the implication of violence in Ms.
Scherer's work (take a look also at her series
"Handmade Original",
"Maedchen" &
"Frauen" ). I have a similar reaction to the work of
Alison Brady. Ms.
Scherer however does not just depict women, like Ms. Brady .
Diana
Scherer's interest in death is universal and the images that I am interested in and attracted to are those of her
"Still-life" series - presenting
tableaux with dead animals. Perhaps for me it is easier to look at death when it is an animal than when it is a human being depicted, as it is more removed and I do not have to face my own mortality. I guess that would be the obvious and most trite explanation. However I also find the animal form more worthy of examination (I mostly photograph animals in my personal work). I certainly find the animal symbolically more "pure" and universal.
From an aesthetic point of view I knew Ms.
Schere's images worked and that they are interesting, but I wasn't so sure if they were jibing with my ethics. I do understand that millions of animals are slaughtered everyday for no purpose or the purpose of consumption, however I do not like the idea of using an animal purposely for an art project, even if it could potentially produce change. The husband and I had many discussion about this complex issue.
Thus I was reluctant to embrace Diana Scherer's work, because while the images are seductive and clever, I was not sure how I felt about them because I did not have more information about
how they were made.
But the
"Godfather"of Photo Blogging, as
Joerg Colberg was so aptly and affectionately named by
Andrew Hetherington, gave me some feedback on the work.
Joerg Colberg was a
judge at Hyeres and while he is not speaking for Diana directly he explained that while he met her at
Heres, she clarified the story behind her work and that all the animals she used were already dead and not killed for the purpose of her work. She also recounted that her grandfather was a hunter and that she loved animals and could not understand death and would try to revive the dead animals. Apparently part of her hopes of saving the animals involved her placing the dead animals in her grandparent's bed. Love that tidbit!
I want to thank Joerg
Colberg for giving me some extra information on the work. It has made a huge difference and also reminded me how great the photo
blogosphere can be.The exchange of information is invaluable and best of all: it is accessible to most.
Ms.
Scherer's work has given me a little insight into the motivation behind some of my own work and hopefully I can blog about that soon. I am still formulating my thoughts and trying to tie Goethe, Gerhard Richter, Diana
Scherer and myself together; I am getting there slowly.
Oh and talking about
animals in art: Thank you,
Rona --who sent me the most beautiful
postcard depicting deer - from a Chinese hanging scroll from the 10 or 11th Century.